Skip to main content

This is what happens if a death row inmate resists during the execution


The most famous instance I know of in recent history of resistance to execution is Charles Campbell in the state of Washington in 1994. He was convicted of murdering his prior rape victim for testifying against him in the rape case, which led to his conviction. A friend of the rape/murder victim happened to be at her house the day he showed up and she was murdered as well, as was the 8 year old daughter of the murder victim.

When the day of his execution arrived, Campbell struggled with the execution team and was thus pepper sprayed. The execution team, not wanting to battle with Campbell any longer as he was a rather large and strong individual, strapped him to a “hanging board” and carried him to the gallows. Campbell tried moving his head various ways to avoid the noose, but eventually the noose was properly placed and the execution carried out. The Governor of Washington at the time was against the death penalty but refused to commute Campbell’s sentence.


1994: Charles Rodman Campbell, hanged in Washington





On this date in 1994, an uncooperative Charles Rodman Campbell was lashed to a board to keep him upright, and hanged by the neck until dead at the Washington State Penitentiary in Walla Walla.


According to this Seattle Times timeline of his life and crimes, Campbell had been getting in trouble since he was a child, to the extent that by the time he was seventeen his mother had given up on him and never wanted him back home again. His crimes began with burglary and drug use but quickly escalated into violence.


True crime author Ann Rule wrote a chapter about Campbell in her book A Rose For Her Grave and Other True Cases:


Charles Rodman Campbell is a killer straight out of a nightmare. There should have been some way to keep him locked up forever. But he slipped through the loopholes of our justice system and he was allowed freedom to stalk his unknowing victims. If ever there was a case that pitted innocence against pure evil, it is this one. He was out of his cage, and he was aware of every facet of her life, and yet his potential prey felt only a chill premonition of danger. He was a man consumed with rage and the need for revenge. Because of a neglectful bureaucracy, Campbell was allowed to take not one life — but three.


The sordid story that lead to his execution began on December 11, 1974, when Campbell broke into the rural Clearview, Washington home of Renae Louise Wicklund. He held a knife to the throat of her baby daughter, Shannah, forced Renae to perform oral sex on him, then fled the scene.


It took over a year to arrest him, but Renae identified him as her attacker and in 1976 he was convicted of burglary, sodomy and first-degree assault and sentenced to thirty years in prison.


In an appalling oversight, Campbell was put on work-release for good behavior in 1981. His behavior in the Monroe Reformatory hadn’t been good at all: he’d racked up multiple infractions for drug trafficking and sexual and physical violence against his fellow inmates. A prison psychologist described him as “uncaring of others, conscienceless, malevolently intolerant of the social order which imprisons him, and imminently harmful to all who directly or indirectly capture his attention or interest.”


It wasn’t until much, much too late that the parole board discovered the Monroe Reformatory was not supplying them with full records of prisoners’ infractions. Hundreds of inmates, it turned out, had been released without a complete evaluation of their behavior in custody.


No surprise, Campbell’s behavior on work-release wasn’t good either. He displayed “poor attitude and behavior,” he was caught drinking alcohol, and his ex-wife claimed he slipped away from his job twice to rape her.


But somehow, the authorities neglected to return him to prison.


Renae Wicklund still lived in the Clearview home where she had been attacked in 1974, and she wasn’t notified when Campbell was let out of prison. In January 1982, he was transferred to a work-release residence less than ten miles from Clearview and he began staking out her house, planning his next move.


On April 14, Campbell went to her home and found her there with Shannah (now eight years old) and a neighbor, Barbara Hendrickson, who along with Renae had testified against him at the rape trial.


Campbell killed them all by slashing their throats. Renae got special treatment: she was also beaten, strangled, stripped naked and her genitals mutilated.


He’d finally committed an offense grave enough to revoke his work-release status.


Campbell was arrested almost immediately and, at his trial, had little to say for himself. It can’t have been hard for the jury to choose the death sentence. As a result of the triple homicide, Washington state passed a law requiring that victims of violent crime be informed when their attackers are released from prison.


The state of Washington allowed (and still allows — it’s the only state with an active gallows) a condemned inmate a choice in the manner of death: hanging, or lethal injection.


During his twelve years of appeals, Campbell refused to make the choice and argued that being made to choose meant the state was effectively forcing him to commit suicide. The default method at the time for a prisoner who refused to choose was hanging,* and Campbell further claimed that was cruel and unusual punishment.


His case actually made it up to the U.S. Supreme Court, but it declined to hear his appeal.


When his time came, the prison staff had to use pepper spray to persuade him to come out of his cell, strap him to a board and drag him to the scaffold, and even then he made things difficult by turning his head this way and that while they tried to secure the hood and noose. But he couldn’t delay the end for long. The prison guards would later find makeshift weapons in his cell, including a four-inch piece of metal in his cell that had been sharpened into a blade.


As of this writing, Campbell was the last man to be judicially hanged in Washington state (though not the last in the U.S.).


* In 1996, the default method of execution in Washington changed to lethal injection.


you can click here to watch the video

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Huge Man Caught His Woman With Her Personal Fitness Trainer. See What He Did Next

Huge Man Caught His Woman With Her Personal Fitness Trainer. See What He Did Next See why some men don't really like the idea of their women having personal fitness trainer, due to the body contact that occurs during the training. See also :  "I Have Slept With 2,500 Ladies" - British Fitness Trainer Boasts This is born out of jealousy.  Here is a video showing the moment a huge man saw his woman in action with her fitness personal training and it went all wrong. The man was jealous of what the fitness trainer was doing to his woman and immediately rushed the trainer, pulled him off his woman and attacked him. See also :  "I Have Slept With 2,500 Ladies" - British Fitness Trainer Boasts Who is to blame in this kind of situation? Didn't the man know what is obtainable during fitness training?  Watch the video  Did the fitness trainer cross his boundary? Click Here To See More Photos You Can Click Here to Watch The Video

Caught with her pants down: Boozed up girl snapped 'pooing in river'

Caught with her pants down: Boozed up girl snapped 'pooing in river' A WOMAN has been photographed squatting over the River Tyne with her trousers down in broad daylight. The girl appears to be relieving herself in Newcastle city centre over the Easter weekend. See also :  25 celebrity that pee on stage with their pants down The picture shows the girl, dressed in a white shirt, white trousers and high heel boots, squatting in Newcastle's bustling Quayside. OOPS: The woman was caught with her trousers down in broad daylight   (Image: NNP) And she doesn't seem put off by the number of stunned onlookers who stopped to take pictures of her. See also :  25 celebrity that pee on stage with their pants down The cheeky snap has been shared hundreds of times on social media. VIRAL: The picture has been an online sensation after it was uploaded to Facebook   (Image: NNP) People have branded the woman's behaviour as "horrible", "scruffy" and "disgustin

Popular posts from this blog

How common were instances of sexual abuse in Nazi concentration camps

How common were instances of sexual abuse in Nazi concentration camps. The accounts that rap£ or prostitution was common, Were the guards were given "free reign" over the prisoners given view of them as subhuman The Nazis sort of developed a network of state-controlled brothels during the war. This included both the civilian and military brothels. The Nazis even set up brothels for the forced labor inmates that helped with the German war effort as incentives for higher production from prisoners in camps. Back then these brothels were suppose to serving several needs. For the soldiers that were far away from home, the Nazis thought that having these brothels would reduce the possibility of rape in occupied lands and reducing the sexual relations with impure local women or forced laborer's, as well. Heck, the Nazis tried to use these brothel women to cure homosexuality as a treatment with male prisoners that were gay. Regular German women were exempt from serving in these b

The prisoners in concentration camps have sex with each other

 The prisoners in concentration camps have sex with each other Steady on. Nearly all concentration camps were single-sex, and at those that held both men and women the sexes were usually kept separate, though at Auschwitz III (Monowitz) and possibly also some other sub-camps they worked together. At extermination camps (where the sexes were not separated) most of the prisoners were killed within 24 hours of arrival. Prisoners did not have privacy. Remember that at the time most people had a horror of same-sex relations, especially between men. However, some Kapos and even guards forced prisoners to have sex with them. In Night Elie Wiesel relates how he found his Kapo having sex with a female prisoner, and he (Wiesel) was given 25 lashes for finding them having sex.* In the Women’s Camp at least one guard forced another woman to have sex with her, and at many camps there was a piepel (camp bum boy). *He also describes the hanging of the piepel of a Blockältester ( ‘block senior’). The