Skip to main content
1 comment

Here is the of execution in history that will make your hair stand on end

This method is Poena cullei (penalty of the sack), used as a way of punishing those who kill their mother, father or other close relatives (known as parricide) - it stems from ancient Rome. The first known version of the punishment was carried out right around 98 BC until the Emperor Hadrian really ramped it up in the 2nd Century AD.

The Punishment

For the crime of killing your nearest and dearest, you met your maker in just as cruel a manner. First, you would be bound by the hands. Then, a sack made of animal skin placed over your head (already horrible on a hot day, as you instantly start to panic and slightly suffocate). Next, they couldn’t have you running off blind, bound and gasping, so they would place wooden clogs or boards on your feet.

Now, they proceed to beat the hell out of you. Actually, they beat you until you’re bloody (it’s the law) and then, gasping for air and unable to see the gruesome wounds, they then beat you a bit more. And now we wait for you to die... Just kidding! Now they put you into a giant sack that Romans typically used to transport large amounts of wine (those of you who know ancient Rome, know that they had these on hand quite readily). Now we wait? Nope, sorry, now they place some friends in the bag with you - before Hadrian got involved it was mostly just snakes. But now that you’ve committed such a crime in Hadrian’s time, you get way cooler friends: a snake, a rooster, a dog and… a monkey!

Como what?! I know! They didn’t always have monkeys so sometimes you got whatever else was to hand (sometimes more snakes), can you imagine being trapped in a bag with just an angry monkey let alone part of a small farm? So, you’re all trapped together and only one of you deserves to be here and the rest are programmed to carry out Darwin’s evolutionary theory on your face! Oh, and you can’t even use your hands to protect your face, because they’re still tied.

I feel like that’s not it. Correctamundo! You and your friends are transported by an Ox, to the nearest body of water: a running stream, a lake or the sea! And we all know what comes next: a hard drop and a sudden plop! You and your innocent animal friends (who have probably already severely maimed you by now) are dropped into the water to slowly drown together in a melee of survival instinct and pure violence. We have to imagine the sound of panicking animals and a human in agony (still with the bag on their head) must have been quite horrible.

[Yeah, something like this image, except less hand freedom, more blindness, way better footwear and where is the dog?! I mean, either the artist phoned this one in or they were fresh outta sacks, man-eating Maltese and wooden sandals that day.]

Effectiveness

Well, this technique was so gruesome that the Romans reverted to just throwing people to the beasts in gladiatorial arenas. I mean, that’s much messier (come on guys, all the mess was conveniently locked away in the bag!) and the beasts had a fighting chance. Then, Constantine came along and brought it back but this time with just snakes, like it was in the beginning - lots and lots of snakes. Imagine those wriggling and twisting and writhing all over you and biting and licking (arrgh! Scared myself).

Such was the effectiveness of this as a deterrent for people not killing their families, that the Byzantines (yeah, the ones who built the Hagia Sophia) adopted it and kept it as a punishment for over 4 centuries. Then the Germans picked it up and ran with it for a while in the mid-1700s.

Just writing this made my hairs stand up. What a way to go. I guess it does beg the question, “does the punishment fit the crime?” I do feel bad for the animals who did nothing to deserve such a fate. But the Romans were not known for their mercy towards animals… or murderers… or slaves… or people who made jokes about the Emperor (see ‘Caracalla in Alexandria’ for that story).

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

German soldier with a Soviet female POW in a field, 1941

Dude looks like he was just in the middle of something with the POW and looked up to see a bunch of Soviet soldiers staring at him. He looks caught off guard and his gear is messed up (off to the side). My guess is camera persons took this pic while an altercation betweeen the two was going on or had just finished. Plus the grass (or whatever there standing in) is all pushed down which indicates signs od a ground struggle Sick fuck is holding his belt as if he was removing it. Knowing that 10 million women were raped by the Wehrmacht on the eastern front, Im fairly certain that the same will unfortunately be her fate His right hand appears to be holding the magazine on an MP-38/40, in a barrel up position. Can't quite tell what's going on with the left hand. The cartridge belt is on sideways, anyway. Unless he invented a new fashion trend, I would assume he's been thrashing around and the belt shifted. Not good. 60 Minutes did a story on rape of Soviet women by German soldi...
Post a Comment
Read more

Popular posts from this blog

How common were instances of sexual abuse in Nazi concentration camps

How common were instances of sexual abuse in Nazi concentration camps. The accounts that rap£ or prostitution was common, Were the guards were given "free reign" over the prisoners given view of them as subhuman The Nazis sort of developed a network of state-controlled brothels during the war. This included both the civilian and military brothels. The Nazis even set up brothels for the forced labor inmates that helped with the German war effort as incentives for higher production from prisoners in camps. Back then these brothels were suppose to serving several needs. For the soldiers that were far away from home, the Nazis thought that having these brothels would reduce the possibility of rape in occupied lands and reducing the sexual relations with impure local women or forced laborer's, as well. Heck, the Nazis tried to use these brothel women to cure homosexuality as a treatment with male prisoners that were gay. Regular German women were exempt from serving in these b...
Post a Comment
Read more

The prisoners in concentration camps have sex with each other

 The prisoners in concentration camps have sex with each other Steady on. Nearly all concentration camps were single-sex, and at those that held both men and women the sexes were usually kept separate, though at Auschwitz III (Monowitz) and possibly also some other sub-camps they worked together. At extermination camps (where the sexes were not separated) most of the prisoners were killed within 24 hours of arrival. Prisoners did not have privacy. Remember that at the time most people had a horror of same-sex relations, especially between men. However, some Kapos and even guards forced prisoners to have sex with them. In Night Elie Wiesel relates how he found his Kapo having sex with a female prisoner, and he (Wiesel) was given 25 lashes for finding them having sex.* In the Women’s Camp at least one guard forced another woman to have sex with her, and at many camps there was a piepel (camp bum boy). *He also describes the hanging of the piepel of a Blockältester ( ‘block senior’). ...
Post a Comment
Read more